Comments on: Flyway Migrations With Spring WebFlux (R2DBC) https://blog.codersee.com/flyway-spring-webflux/ Kotlin & Backend Tutorials - Learn Through Practice. Wed, 16 Apr 2025 04:50:21 +0000 hourly 1 By: Piotr https://blog.codersee.com/flyway-spring-webflux/#comment-58 Sat, 17 Dec 2022 15:11:16 +0000 https://codersee.com/?p=2502876#comment-58 In reply to Jan Zidek.

Hi Jan!
Agree with your point that this is a bit of hack and it would be great to have an r2dbc version for it. I can’t agree on Flyway being an abandoned project, as it is still developed and new versions are still released.

The good point is that Flyway library is used only on the app startup. (+ we can always extract the db schema management to a separate repository and manage it through an automated CI/CD)

Thanks for your comment and I really appreciate it! That’s what Codersee is for- learning and constructive confrontation of different views!

]]> By: Jan Zidek https://blog.codersee.com/flyway-spring-webflux/#comment-57 Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:47:39 +0000 https://codersee.com/?p=2502876#comment-57 Yes, we use a similar workaround. However, it is an ugly hack, needed only due to the inability of Flyway to implement the proper R2DB support.
Having dependencies both on reactive and non-reactive libraries is not good.

The issue https://github.com/flyway/f… has been opened since 12.09.2019, i.e. over 3 years now, without any reasonable reaction. It looks like abandoned project with no perspective.

]]>